From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oracle USA, Inc. v. Sap AG

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
Oct 7, 2011
Case No. 07-CV-1658 PJH (EDL) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 07-CV-1658 PJH (EDL)

10-07-2011

ORACLE USA, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. SAP AG, et al., Defendants.

Robert A. Mittelstaedt (SBN 060359) Jason McDonell (SBN 115084) Elaine Wallace (SBN 197882) JONES DAY Tharan Gregory Lanier (SBN 138784) Jane L. Froyd (SBN 220776) JONES DAY Scott W. Cowan (Admitted Pro Hac Vice ) Joshua L. Fuchs (Admitted Pro Hac Vice ) JONES DAY Attorneys for Defendants SAP AG, SAP AMERICA, INC., and TOMORROWNOW, INC. BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP DONN P. PICKETT (SBN 72257) GEOFFREY M. HOWARD (SBN 157468) ZACHARY J. ALINDER (SBN 209009) BREE HANN (SBN 215695) BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP DAVID BOIES (Admitted Pro Hac Vice ) STEVEN C. HOLTZMAN (SBN 144177) FRED NORTON (SBN 224725) DORIAN DALEY (SBN 129049) JENNIFER GLOSS (SBN 154227) Attorneys for Plaintiffs Oracle USA, Inc., et al.


Robert A. Mittelstaedt (SBN 060359)

Jason McDonell (SBN 115084)

Elaine Wallace (SBN 197882)

JONES DAY

Tharan Gregory Lanier (SBN 138784)

Jane L. Froyd (SBN 220776)

JONES DAY

Scott W. Cowan (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

Joshua L. Fuchs (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

JONES DAY

Attorneys for Defendants

SAP AG, SAP AMERICA, INC., and

TOMORROWNOW, INC.

BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP

DONN P. PICKETT (SBN 72257)

GEOFFREY M. HOWARD (SBN 157468)

ZACHARY J. ALINDER (SBN 209009)

BREE HANN (SBN 215695)

BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP

DAVID BOIES (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

STEVEN C. HOLTZMAN (SBN 144177)

FRED NORTON (SBN 224725)

DORIAN DALEY (SBN 129049)

JENNIFER GLOSS (SBN 154227)

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Oracle USA, Inc., et al.

STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MAY RELEASE THE SUPERSEDEAS BOND

Date: N/A

Time: N/A

Courtroom: 3, 3rd Floor

Judge: Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton

STIPULATED REQUEST TO RELEASE DEFENDANTS' SUPERSEDEAS BOND

Defendants SAP AG, SAP America, Inc., and TomorrowNow, Inc. ("Defendants") submit this Stipulated Request and [Proposed] Order that Defendants may release the supersedeas bond previously approved by Court Order at ECF No. 1077.

WHEREAS, on June 22, 2011 this Court entered an order approving a supersedeas bond in the amount of $1,325,033,547.00 as appropriate security to stay execution of the final judgment entered on February 3, 2011 (ECF No. 1036), pending disposition of post-judgment motions and, if necessary, appeal. See ECF No. 1077.

WHEREAS, on September 1, 2011 this Court granted Defendants' motions for judgment as a matter of law and motion for a new trial, and vacated "that portion of the February 3, 2011 judgment awarding $1.3 billion for hypothetical license damages." See ECF No. 1081 at 20.

WHEREAS, as a result of the Court's September 1, 2011 order, there is no final judgment upon which Oracle can execute.

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Oracle USA, Inc., Oracle International Corporation, and Siebel Systems, Inc. ("Oracle," and together with Defendants, the "Parties") stipulate to this request.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the Parties, through their respective counsel of record, that Defendants may release the supersedeas bond previously approved by Court Order at ECF No. 1077.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

JONES DAY

Tharan Gregory Lanier

Counsel for Defendants

SAP AG, SAP AMERICA, INC., and

TOMORROWNOW, INC.

In accordance with General Order No. 45, Rule X, the above signatory attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatory below.

BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP

Geoffrey M. Howard

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

ORACLE USA, INC., ORACLE

INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, and

SIEBEL SYSTEMS, INC.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Oracle USA, Inc. v. Sap AG

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
Oct 7, 2011
Case No. 07-CV-1658 PJH (EDL) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2011)
Case details for

Oracle USA, Inc. v. Sap AG

Case Details

Full title:ORACLE USA, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. SAP AG, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

Date published: Oct 7, 2011

Citations

Case No. 07-CV-1658 PJH (EDL) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2011)