From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 22, 2011
No. C 10-03561 WHA (N.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 10-03561 WHA

11-22-2011

ORACLE AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE INC., Defendant.


SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER TO SUBMIT COLOR-CODED HANDOUT OF CLAIMS TO BE TRIED

There seems to be confusion between the parties regarding whether obviousness combinations should be allowed in the color-coded handout. They should not be. The color-coded handouts are strictly for evaluating anticipation by single references. Please conform accordingly.

The parties should also include a legend on each page that identifies the meaning of the red lining, and the blue and gray highlighting with the names of anticipatory references, such as "missing from Android" and "missing from Reference X."

A new joint handout must be filed by NOON ON NOVEMBER 30, 2011.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 22, 2011
No. C 10-03561 WHA (N.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2011)
Case details for

Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ORACLE AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE INC., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 22, 2011

Citations

No. C 10-03561 WHA (N.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2011)