From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 8, 2011
No. C 10-03561 WHA (N.D. Cal. Nov. 8, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 10-03561 WHA

11-08-2011

ORACLE AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE INC., Defendant.


ORDER REGARDING CONSTRUCTION OF CLAIMS TO BE TRIED

With respect to the 26 claims to be tried, the Court expects to advise the jury that all terms have their ordinary meaning, unless previously construed. If any party contends otherwise, then it must specify the claim, the term therein, and its proposed construction by NOON ON DECEMBER 2, 2011. Drafts must be exchanged seven calendar days before and an in-person conference must be held to work out differences within the seven-day period. Please try to stipulate to any meaning other than the ordinary meaning. By NOON ON DECEMBER 9, 2011, each side shall respond stating with particularity its objection, if any, to the proposed constructions. This pleading will be used by the judge for case and trial management purposes. A party may not deviate from any earlier claim construction contentions unless it is to accept the ordinary meaning, to stipulate to an agreed meaning, or to accept the other side's earlier contention.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 8, 2011
No. C 10-03561 WHA (N.D. Cal. Nov. 8, 2011)
Case details for

Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ORACLE AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE INC., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 8, 2011

Citations

No. C 10-03561 WHA (N.D. Cal. Nov. 8, 2011)