From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oraa v. McKennell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 10, 1999
261 A.D.2d 461 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

May 10, 1999

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winick, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs' contention, the Supreme Court properly found that the plaintiff Mark E. Oraa was a volunteer, and therefore not entitled to the protection of Labor Law §§ 200 Lab., 240 Lab.(1) and § 241 Lab.(6) ( see, Whelen v. Warwick Val. Civic Social Club, 47 N.Y.2d 970; Howerter v. Dugan, 232 A.D.2d 524; Yearke v. Zarcone, 57 A.D.2d 457).

The appellants' remaining contentions are without merit.

Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Oraa v. McKennell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 10, 1999
261 A.D.2d 461 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Oraa v. McKennell

Case Details

Full title:MARK E. ORAA et al., Appellants v. BRIAN McKENNELL, Doing Business as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 10, 1999

Citations

261 A.D.2d 461 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
687 N.Y.S.2d 301

Citing Cases

McNulty v. Executive Kitchens

Although the Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, it should also have…

Mattes v. Joseph

Accordingly, the law imposed no duty on the appellant to protect the decedent from the unfortunate…