O.R. v. Clark Cnty. Sch. Dist.

Full title: O.R., BY AND THROUGH HER PARENTS, SIG AND LORI ROGICH AND SIG AND LORI…

Court: United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Jan 3, 2022

2:17-cv-01541-RFB-NJK (D. Nev. Jan. 3, 2022)

Opinion

2:17-cv-01541-RFB-NJK

01-03-2022

O.R., BY AND THROUGH HER PARENTS, SIG AND LORI ROGICH AND SIG AND LORI ROGICH, INDIVIDUALLY, Plaintiffs, v. CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant.

CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISRICT OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL PHOEBE V. REDMOND, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 9657 Attorney for Defendant, Clark County School District FREEMAN LAW OFFICES, LLC HILLARY D. FREEMAN, ESQ. N.J. Attorney I.D. #002362006 Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Richard E. Boulware, II, United States District Court

CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISRICT

OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL

PHOEBE V. REDMOND, ESQ.

Nevada Bar No. 9657

Attorney for Defendant, Clark County School District

FREEMAN LAW OFFICES, LLC

HILLARY D. FREEMAN, ESQ.

N.J. Attorney I.D. #002362006

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS FILED PURSUANT TO ECF No. 87 (THIRD REQUEST)

Richard E. Boulware, II, United States District Court

COME NOW, Plaintiffs O.R., by and through her Parents, Sig and Lori Rogich and Sig and Lori Rogich, individually, (“Plaintiffs”), and Defendant Clark County School District (“Defendant”), by and through their attorneys of record, and hereby stipulate and agree that Defendant may have up to and including January 31, 2022, to respond to PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COST, Filed Pursuant to ECF No. 87 in this matter.

On December 12, 2021, the Court ordered that Defendant's response was due January 3, 2022 (ECF No. 91). The Plaintiffs and Defendant acknowledge that a settlement check has been issued by Defendant and received by the Plaintiffs. Additional time is needed to allow the deposited funds to be processed and released by Plaintiffs' bank. Upon release of the 1 settlement funds by Plaintiffs' bank, Plaintiffs will withdraw their pending Motion thereby rendering the subject moot. This is the third request for an extension of time, however, this request is being entered for good cause, in good faith and not for reason of delay.

THEREFORE, the parties respectfully request the response due date be extended up to and including January 31, 2022.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 2