From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O'Quinn v. Hrabe

United States District Court, District of Kansas
Jul 19, 2024
23-cv-03117-TC-BGS (D. Kan. Jul. 19, 2024)

Opinion

23-cv-03117-TC-BGS

07-19-2024

JUSTIN T. O'QUINN, Plaintiff v. JOEL HRABE, MICHELLE SULLIVAN, MARK KEATING, Defendants


NOTICE AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

TOBY CROUSE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Invoking 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Plaintiff Justin O'Quinn, proceeding pro se, alleges that Defendants Hrabe and Keating deprived him of his Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment rights by misapplying “jail credit” to his sentence. Doc. 46 at 2. He separately raises a “wrongful incarceration” claim against Sullivan. Id. at 4. Hrabe, Keating, and Sulli-van-the only remaining defendants-filed a joint motion to dismiss. Doc. 48. Under D. Kan. R. 6.1(d)(2), Plaintiff's response was due “21 days after the motion was served,” on approximately June 18, 2024, see Doc. 48 at 16. More than 30 days have elapsed since filing, but Plaintiff has not responded.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED BY THE COURT THAT Plaintiff is directed to show cause by August 2, 2024 why the motion to dismiss should not be granted as unopposed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

O'Quinn v. Hrabe

United States District Court, District of Kansas
Jul 19, 2024
23-cv-03117-TC-BGS (D. Kan. Jul. 19, 2024)
Case details for

O'Quinn v. Hrabe

Case Details

Full title:JUSTIN T. O'QUINN, Plaintiff v. JOEL HRABE, MICHELLE SULLIVAN, MARK…

Court:United States District Court, District of Kansas

Date published: Jul 19, 2024

Citations

23-cv-03117-TC-BGS (D. Kan. Jul. 19, 2024)