From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Opperman v. Path, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Aug 15, 2014
13-cv-00453-JST (N.D. Cal. Aug. 15, 2014)

Opinion

          Robert B. Hawk Maren J. Clouse Jenny Q. Shen HOGAN LOVELLS U.S. LLP Menlo Park, California Clayton C. James HOGAN LOVELLS U.S. LLP Denver, CO Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC.

          James M. Wagstaffe Michael von Loewenfeldt Michael Ng KERR & WAGSTAFFE LLP San Francisco, CA Interim Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs

          David M. Given Nicholas A. Carlin PHILLIPS, ERLEWINE & GIVEN LLP San Francisco, CA Interim Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs

          Carl F. Schwenker (admitted pro hac vice) LAW OFFICES OF CARL F. SCHWENKER Austin, TX Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel


          STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING PAGE LIMITS FOR DEFENDANT APPLE INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT

          JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.

         Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-4(b), Plaintiffs in this proceeding ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant Apple Inc. ("Apple") (collectively, the "Parties"), hereby stipulate as follows:

         1. On July 9, 2014, the Court set August 22, 2014 as the deadline for Apple and other Defendants to submit their Motions to Dismiss the Second Consolidated Amended Complaint.

         2. On July 9, 2014, the Court set a hearing on Motions to Dismiss for December 2, 2014, at 2:00 p.m.

         3. Given the number of claims and issues to be addressed in the Second Consolidated Amended Complaint, the Parties believe a modest enlargement of the default page limitations is warranted;

         4. Counsel for the Parties have met and conferred and have come to an agreement, subject to the approval of the Court, regarding page limits for briefing on Apple's Motion to Dismiss;

         NOW THEREFORE, the Parties stipulate as follows:

Apple's Motion to Dismiss shall not exceed thirty (30) pages in length; and

Plaintiff's response to Apple's Motion to Dismiss shall not exceed thirty (30) pages in length.

         [PROPOSED] ORDER

         PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

Apple's Motion to Dismiss Memorandum shall not exceed thirty (30) pages;

Plaintiff's Opposition Memorandum shall not exceed thirty (30) pages.


Summaries of

Opperman v. Path, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Aug 15, 2014
13-cv-00453-JST (N.D. Cal. Aug. 15, 2014)
Case details for

Opperman v. Path, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MARC OPPERMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PATH, INC., et al. Defendants. THIS…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division

Date published: Aug 15, 2014

Citations

13-cv-00453-JST (N.D. Cal. Aug. 15, 2014)