From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oppenheim v. Thanasoulis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 24, 1908
123 App. Div. 494 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)

Opinion

January 24, 1908.

James A. Allen, for the appellant.

J.J. Pantell, for the respondents.

Present — PATTERSON, P.J., INGRAHAM, CLARKE, HOUGHTON and SCOTT, JJ.


The injunction order appealed from must be reversed, because it grants the relief demanded in the complaint upon motion and prior to the trial of the action. It is not an injunction pendente lite, but by its terms is permanent. The court has no power to make such an order in advance of the trial.

The order appealed from is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs.


Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.


Summaries of

Oppenheim v. Thanasoulis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 24, 1908
123 App. Div. 494 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)
Case details for

Oppenheim v. Thanasoulis

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM OPPENHEIM and MEYER VESSEL, Respondents, v . ARISTIDES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 24, 1908

Citations

123 App. Div. 494 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)
108 N.Y.S. 505

Citing Cases

R.C. v. The City of New York

Generally, courts may not issue permanent injunctions before trial or a motion for summary judgment (see…

R.C. v. N.Y.C.

[5–7] Generally, courts may not issue permanent injunctions before trial or a motion for summary judgment…