From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oppenheim v. Commonwealth

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dec 10, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-3435 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 10, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-3435

12-10-2012

NEIL OPPENHEIM v. COMMONWEALTH, et al.


ORDER

AND NOW, this 10th day of December, 2012, upon consideration of the pleadings and the record herein, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of M. Faith Angell, United States Magistrate Judge, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED AND ADOPTED.
2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED AND DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.

There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.

BY THE COURT:

______________

HARVEY BARTLE III, J.


Summaries of

Oppenheim v. Commonwealth

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dec 10, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-3435 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 10, 2012)
Case details for

Oppenheim v. Commonwealth

Case Details

Full title:NEIL OPPENHEIM v. COMMONWEALTH, et al.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Dec 10, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-3435 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 10, 2012)