Opinion
Civil Action 3:23-CV-1372-X-BH
11-14-2023
LISA OPPENHAMMER, ID # 2267205, Petitioner, v. DIRECTOR, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Respondent.
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
BRANTLEY STARR, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.
Pending before the Court are a pair of Plaintiff Lisa Oppenhammer's motions to amend or alter the judgment. (Docs. 13, 15). The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. (Docs. 14, 16). Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez recommends denying each motion. Oppenhammer objected to Judge Ramirez's recommendations. Oppenhammer is requesting that the Court “correct a mistake arising from oversight.”The District Court reviewed de novo those portions of the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation to which objection was made, and reviewed the remaining proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Oppermhammer's motions to amend or alter the judgment. (Docs. 13, 15).
Doc. 15 at 1.
IT IS SO ORDERED.