From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oppelt v. State

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Dec 12, 2014
No. 04-14-00392-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 12, 2014)

Opinion

No. 04-14-00392-CR

12-12-2014

Billy Bob OPPELT, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2010CR5849
Honorable Raymond Angelini, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant's court-appointed attorney has filed a brief and motion to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he asserts there are no meritorious issues to raise on appeal. Counsel sent copies of the brief and motion to withdraw to appellant, Billy Bob Oppelt, and explained to Oppelt his rights to review the record, file a pro se brief, and file a pro se petition for discretionary review if this court determines the appeal is frivolous. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). In addition, counsel's letter advised appellant to immediately file a motion in this court if he wished to review the appellate record, and counsel enclosed a form motion for this purpose. See id.

No timely request for the record has been filed in this court. If appellant desires to file a pro se brief, we order that he do so by January 12, 2015.

The State has filed a notice waiving its right to file a brief in this case unless appellant files a pro se brief. If appellant files a timely pro se brief, the State may file a responsive brief no later than thirty days after appellant's pro se brief is filed in this court.

We further order the motion to withdraw filed by appellant's counsel is held in abeyance pending further order of the court. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-82, 109 S. Ct. 346, 102 L. Ed.2d 300 (1988) (holding that a motion to withdraw should not be ruled on before appellate court independently reviews the record to determine whether counsel's evaluation that the appeal is frivolous is sound); Schulman v. State, 252 S.W.3d 403, 410-11 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) (same). Accordingly, no new attorney will be appointed for appellant at this time.

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on appellant, his counsel, the attorney for the State, and the clerk of the trial court.

/s/_________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 12th day of December, 2014.

/s/_________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Oppelt v. State

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Dec 12, 2014
No. 04-14-00392-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 12, 2014)
Case details for

Oppelt v. State

Case Details

Full title:Billy Bob OPPELT, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

Date published: Dec 12, 2014

Citations

No. 04-14-00392-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 12, 2014)