From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oplink Commc'n, Inc. v. Finisar Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Nov 3, 2011
Case No. 11-cv-02361-EMC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 11-cv-02361-EMC

11-03-2011

OPLINK COMMUNICATIONS, INC., and OPTICAL COMMUNICATION PRODUCTS, INC., Plaintiffs, v. FINISAR CORPORATION, Defendant.

COOLEY LLP Sarah J. Guske Attorneys for Plaintiffs OPLINK COMMUNICATIONS INC. and OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS PRODUCTS, INC. MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP Michael J. Lyons Attorneys for Defendant FINISAR CORPORATION


COOLEY LLP

THOMAS J. FRIEL, JR. (State Bar No. 80065)

JAMES P. BROGAN (State Bar No. 155906)

SARAH J. GUSKE (State Bar No. 232467)

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

OPLINK COMMUNICATIONS, INC., and

OPTICAL COMMUNICATION PRODUCTS,

INC.

Daniel Johnson, Jr. (State Bar No. 57409)

Michael J. Lyons (State Bar No. 202284)

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

Attorneys for Defendant

FINISAR CORPORATION

SUPPLEMENTAL JOINT CASE

MANAGEMENT STATEMENT

PURSUANT TO AUGUST 12, 2011 ORDER

ORDER RESETTING CMC

Pursuant to the Court's August 12, 2011 Order during the initial Case Management Conference, Plaintiff Oplink Communications Inc. and Optical Communication Products, Inc. (collectively "Oplink" or "Plaintiff") and Defendant Finisar Corporation ("Finisar" or "Defendant") hereby submit the following Supplemental Joint Case Management Statement:

Since the August 12, 2011 Case Management Conference in this case and the August 5, 2011 Joint Case Management Statement (D.I. 19), the Eastern District of Texas Court for the Optical Commc'n Prods., Inc. v. Finisar Corp. v. Optical Commc'n Prods., Inc. and Oplink Commcn's, Inc., No. 6:11-cv-104-LED) case has yet to rule on Oplink's motion to sever Finisar's infringement counterclaims and to transfer them to this Court.

A second case management conference for this case is scheduled for November 7, 2011 at 9:00 AM.

COOLEY LLP

Sarah J. Guske

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

OPLINK COMMUNICATIONS INC. and OPTICAL

COMMUNICATIONS PRODUCTS, INC.

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

Michael J. Lyons

Attorneys for Defendant

FINISAR CORPORATION

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I, Sarah J. Guske attest that the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 31st day of October, 2011 at Broomfield, Colorado.

Sarah J. Guske

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the CMC is reset from 11/7/11 to 12/16/11 at 9:00 a.m. A joint CMC statement shall be filed by 12/9/11.

Edward M. Chen

U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

Oplink Commc'n, Inc. v. Finisar Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Nov 3, 2011
Case No. 11-cv-02361-EMC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2011)
Case details for

Oplink Commc'n, Inc. v. Finisar Corp.

Case Details

Full title:OPLINK COMMUNICATIONS, INC., and OPTICAL COMMUNICATION PRODUCTS, INC.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Nov 3, 2011

Citations

Case No. 11-cv-02361-EMC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2011)