From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Opinion Number

Attorney General of Louisiana — Opinion
Apr 15, 1998
98-99 (Ops. La. Atty. Gen. Apr. 15, 1998)

Opinion

APRIL 15, 1998

47-A — FIREARMS FIREWORKS 84 — PARISHES 90 — POLICE JURIES — Powers and Functions

The Assumption Parish Police Jury is not prohibited by state or federal law from adopting an ordinance regulating the location, relocation, and closure of firing ranges within the parish. However, a case-by-case determination of the facts must be exercised in order to find whether a public purpose exists for this action.

Mr. Thomas D. Daigle, Esq. Assistant District Attorney 23rd Judicial District Court P.O. Drawer 279 Napoleonville, LA 70390


Dear Mr. Daigle:

On behalf of the Assumption Parish Police Jury, you ask for an opinion as to whether the Police Jury can close or relocate an existing firing range presently located in a residential neighborhood within your parish.

A police jury is a creature and subordinate political subdivision of the State and as such only possesses those powers conferred by the State's Constitution and statutes and may enact an ordinance only in those areas which are not preempted or occupied by the laws and Constitution of the United States or of the State of Louisiana. Rollins Environmental Services of Louisiana, Inc. vs. Iberville Parish Police Jury, 371 So.2d 1127 (La. 1979). This power encompasses the State's authority to impose restraints on private rights which are necessary for the general welfare. Lake Charles Harbor Terminal District vs. Calcasieu Parish Police Jury, 613 So.2d 1031 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1993).

As stated by this office in Opinion Number 80-298, the construction and operation of firing ranges is not regulated by state or federal law. Moreover, Article VI, § 17 of the Louisiana Constitution (1974), authorizes local governmental subdivisions to adopt regulations and standards for land use, provided that this authority is exercised for a public purpose.

You state that the firing range at issue is in a residential area. While you do not explicitly state this as the reason for the tentative closure or relocation, we will assume that the safety and welfare of the residents in that area has instigated this possible action by the Police Jury. Whether this or any other basis serves as a valid public purpose is a determination that should be made on a case-by-case basis by the Police Jury. Unfortunately, this office is not a fact-finding authority and, therefore, can not make this determination. The Police Jury has the power to review the pertinent facts and make such a determination.

However, should the Police Jury exercise this authority and base its conclusions on a proper analysis of the facts, its actions would not on their face be violative of the law.

If our office may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Very truly yours,

RICHARD P. IEYOUB ATTORNEY GENERAL

By: __________________________ CARLOS M. FINALET Assistant Attorney General

RPI/CMF:glb


Summaries of

Opinion Number

Attorney General of Louisiana — Opinion
Apr 15, 1998
98-99 (Ops. La. Atty. Gen. Apr. 15, 1998)
Case details for

Opinion Number

Case Details

Full title:Mr. Thomas D. Daigle, Esq

Court:Attorney General of Louisiana — Opinion

Date published: Apr 15, 1998

Citations

98-99 (Ops. La. Atty. Gen. Apr. 15, 1998)