From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Opinion Number

Attorney General of Louisiana — Opinion
Feb 24, 2011
10-0282 (Ops. La. Atty. Gen. Feb. 24, 2011)

Opinion

February 24, 2011.

94 SCHOOLS SCHOOL DISTRICTS — Administration, Government Officers

La.Civ. Code art. 2320

No Louisiana statute expressly requires any governmental entity, including police departments or school boards, to provide crossing guards for schools. However, school boards have a duty to provide reasonable supervision over students, and such duty may include providing crossing guards for schools if the age of the children and the attendant circumstances warrant it.

Mayor Glenn L. Brasseaux City of Carencro P O Drawer 10 Carencro, Louisiana 70520


Dear Mayor Brasseaux:

You have requested an opinion of the Attorney General on the issue of standing. Specifically, you want to know if someone who lives outside of the city limits of Carencro and who does not work in Carencro has standing to raise a constitutional challenge to a City of Carencro ordinance.

The foundation of Louisiana's standing requirement is La. Code Civ.P. art. 681, which provides that "[e]xcept as otherwise provided by law, an action can be brought only by a person having a real and actual interest which he asserts." A court will not rule on an issue unless the challenged action has created some harm or threat of imminent harm to the individual, nor will a court decide abstract questions of law. Alexandria v. Wilkes, 18 So.2d 341 (La.App. 2 Cir. 1944). Courts have ruled that individuals do not simply have standing as a citizen to challenge a government action that they believe is unconstitutional. Thus, if the individual is simply alleging unconstitutionality and cannot show any type of harm or threat of imminent harm to him, he will not have standing. John E. Nowak Ronald D. Rotunda, Principles of Constitutional Law 41-43 (3d ed. 2007).

In order to have standing, an individual must show that he or she has suffered some harm from the challenged action that is different from the harm to the public generally. Haynes v. Haynes, 02-535 (La.App. 1 Cir. 5/9/03), 848 So.2d 35; Richardson v. Reeves, 600 So.2d 138 (La.App. 2 Cir. 1992); Kenner Fire Dept. v. Municipal Fire and Police Civil Service Bd. of City of Kenner, 96-525 (La.App. 5 Cir. 11/26/96), 685 So.2d 325. The requirement that an individual be able to show an injury resulting from the governmental action in order to bring a constitutional challenge formed the basis for the United States Supreme Court decision in Allen v. Wright, 468 U.S. 737, 104 S.Ct. 3315 (1984).

As it relates to the underlying opinion, it may be difficult for a person who does not work or live in the City of Carencro to prove that he has standing to challenge the constitutionality of a city ordinance. However, the determination of whether standing exists will turn on the facts of the case, and the ultimate determination will have to be made by a court of law.

We hope that this information sufficiently answers your inquiry. If we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us.

With Best Regards,

JAMES D. "BUDDY" CALDWELL ATTORNEY GENERAL

By: __________________________ Anigeligue Duhon Freel Assistant Attorney General

JDC:ADF


Summaries of

Opinion Number

Attorney General of Louisiana — Opinion
Feb 24, 2011
10-0282 (Ops. La. Atty. Gen. Feb. 24, 2011)
Case details for

Opinion Number

Case Details

Full title:Mayor Glenn L. Brasseaux

Court:Attorney General of Louisiana — Opinion

Date published: Feb 24, 2011

Citations

10-0282 (Ops. La. Atty. Gen. Feb. 24, 2011)