From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

OPENWAVE SYSTEMS INC. v. FULD

United States District Court, N.D. California
Feb 6, 2009
CASE NO. C 08-05683-SI (N.D. Cal. Feb. 6, 2009)

Summary

In Openwave Systems, Inc. v. Fuld (N.D.Cal. 2009) 2009 WL 1622164 (Openwave) defendants contended that the plaintiffs allegations against corporate officers and directors failed to state a claim under section 25504 because section 25504, like the "control person" provision of Title 15 of the Securities Act, required a defendant to have exercised day-to-day control over the entity's operations. (Openwave, supra, at p. *6.)

Summary of this case from Hellum v. Breyer

Opinion

CASE NO. C 08-05683-SI.

February 6, 2009


(Proposed) ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE


Todd S. Fishman _____, whose business address and telephone number is Allen Overy LLP, 1221 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10020 (212) 610-6300

and who is an active member in good standing of the bar of U.S. District Court of S.D.N.Y. having applied in the above-entitled action for admission to practice in the Northern District of California on a pro hac vice basis, representing Richard S. Fuld, Jr.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the application is granted, subject to the terms and conditions of Civil L.R. 11-3. All papers filed by the attorney must indicate appearance pro hac vice. Service of papers upon and communication with co-counsel designated in the application will constitute notice to the party. All future filings in this action are subject to the requirements contained in General Order No. 45, Electronic Case Filing.


Summaries of

OPENWAVE SYSTEMS INC. v. FULD

United States District Court, N.D. California
Feb 6, 2009
CASE NO. C 08-05683-SI (N.D. Cal. Feb. 6, 2009)

In Openwave Systems, Inc. v. Fuld (N.D.Cal. 2009) 2009 WL 1622164 (Openwave) defendants contended that the plaintiffs allegations against corporate officers and directors failed to state a claim under section 25504 because section 25504, like the "control person" provision of Title 15 of the Securities Act, required a defendant to have exercised day-to-day control over the entity's operations. (Openwave, supra, at p. *6.)

Summary of this case from Hellum v. Breyer
Case details for

OPENWAVE SYSTEMS INC. v. FULD

Case Details

Full title:OPENWAVE SYSTEMS INC., Plaintiff, v. RICHARD S. FULD, JR., et al.…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Feb 6, 2009

Citations

CASE NO. C 08-05683-SI (N.D. Cal. Feb. 6, 2009)

Citing Cases

Ret. Hous. Grp. Found. v. Fuld

At the conclusion of the hearing, the tentative "remain[ed] merely a tentative," and the parties were invited…

Hellum v. Breyer

The parties direct our attention to two unpublished federal cases which directly address the issue before us,…