From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

OpenTV, Inc. v. Matal

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jan 16, 2018
2017-1250 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 16, 2018)

Opinion

2017-1250

01-16-2018

OPENTV, INC., Appellant v. JOSEPH MATAL, PERFORMING THE FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR, U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Intervenor

ERIKA ARNER, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Reston, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by JOSHUA GOLDBERG, Washington, DC; CORY C. BELL, Boston, MA. WILLIAM LAMARCA, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, ROBERT J. MCMANUS.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2015-01031.

JUDGMENT

ERIKA ARNER, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Reston, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by JOSHUA GOLDBERG, Washington, DC; CORY C. BELL, Boston, MA. WILLIAM LAMARCA, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, ROBERT J. MCMANUS. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, MOORE and REYNA, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT January 16, 2018

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

OpenTV, Inc. v. Matal

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jan 16, 2018
2017-1250 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 16, 2018)
Case details for

OpenTV, Inc. v. Matal

Case Details

Full title:OPENTV, INC., Appellant v. JOSEPH MATAL, PERFORMING THE FUNCTIONS AND…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jan 16, 2018

Citations

2017-1250 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 16, 2018)