From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Opentv, Inc. and Nagravision S.A. v. Apple Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Aug 17, 2015
3:14-cv-01622-HSG (KAW) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2015)

Opinion

          Robert F. McCauley, Jacob A. Schroeder, FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP, Palo Alto, CA.

          Gerald F. Ivey, Smith R. Brittingham IV (pro hac vice), Elizabeth A. Niemeyer (pro hac vice), John M. Williamson (pro hac vice), Aliza A. George (pro hac vice), Robert D. Wells, Cecilia Sanabria (pro hac vice), FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP, Washington, DC.

          Stephen E. Kabakoff (pro hac vice), FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP, Atlanta, GA, Attorneys for Plaintiffs. OPENTV, INC. and NAGRAVISION S.A.

          George A. Riley, Luann L. Simmons, Drummond Hansen, O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP, San Francisco, California.

          Ryan K. Yagura, Xin-Yi Zhou, Brian M. Cook, Kevin Murray, O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP, Los Angeles, California, Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC.


          STIPULATED REQUEST FOR EXTENSIONS ON OPPOSITION AND REPLY TO APPLE'S MOTION TO STAY; ORDER

          HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr., District Judge.

         Plaintiffs OpenTV, Inc. and Nagravision S.A. ("OpenTV") and Defendant Apple Inc. ("Apple") respectfully submit this stipulated request for four-day extensions of the opposition and reply brief deadlines for Apple's Motion to Stay Pending Completion of IPR Proceedings ("Apple's Motion to Stay").

         Apple's Motion to Stay (Dkt. 194) was filed on August 10, 2015, and is set for hearing on September 22, 2015. Dkt. 198. In view of summer vacations for involved counsel and the Labor Day holiday, counsel for the parties have agreed, and respectfully request, that each side have four additional calendar days to file their respective opposition and reply briefs. Specifically, the parties request that the date for OpenTV's opposition be extended from August 24 to August 28, 2015, and that Apple have eleven days to serve its reply (i.e., until September 8, 2015, the day after Labor Day). The requested extensions will provide the Court with a two-week period to review all of the briefs before the September 22 hearing on the Motion to Stay and will not affect any other dates in this case.

         Respectfully submitted.

          ORDER

         PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Opentv, Inc. and Nagravision S.A. v. Apple Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Aug 17, 2015
3:14-cv-01622-HSG (KAW) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2015)
Case details for

Opentv, Inc. and Nagravision S.A. v. Apple Inc.

Case Details

Full title:OPENTV, INC. and NAGRAVISION S.A., Plaintiffs, v. APPLE INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division

Date published: Aug 17, 2015

Citations

3:14-cv-01622-HSG (KAW) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2015)