From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oparaji v. Miracle Motors, Inc.

Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 2, 2022
2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 51266 (N.Y. App. Term 2022)

Opinion

No. 2020-637 Q C

12-02-2022

Maurice Oparaji, Appellant, v. Miracle Motors, Inc., Maurice G. Mitchell and Monique G. Mitchell, as Administrators of the Estate of Maurice Mitchell, Deceased, Respondents.

Maurice Oparaji, appellant pro se. Law Offices of Ishelli Oliver, Esq. (Ishelli Oliver of counsel), for respondents.


Unpublished Opinion

Maurice Oparaji, appellant pro se.

Law Offices of Ishelli Oliver, Esq. (Ishelli Oliver of counsel), for respondents.

PRESENT: THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, P.J., WAVNY TOUSSAINT, CHEREÉ A. BUGGS, JJ

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Maurice E. Muir, J.), entered August 28, 2019. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted the branch of defendants' motion seeking to dismiss the complaint.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed as abandoned.

Plaintiff commenced this action alleging causes of action for, among other things, fraud, conversion and breach of fiduciary duty. Defendants moved to, among other things, dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7). The Civil Court granted the branch of the motion seeking to dismiss the complaint.

In his main brief submitted on this appeal, plaintiff failed to raise an issue regarding so much of the order appealed from as granted the branch of defendants' motion seeking to dismiss the complaint and, instead, raised issues regarding a previous order compelling discovery from which plaintiff took no appeal. However, in his reply brief, plaintiff raised arguments relating to the order from which he appealed.

The appeal is dismissed as abandoned as plaintiff makes no argument in his main brief with respect to the order appealed from which granted the branch of defendants' motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the action. Plaintiff's arguments that his causes of action were sufficiently alleged are not properly before this court, as they were raised for the first time in the reply brief, and we decline to consider those issues (see Matter of Erdey v City of New York, 129 A.D.3d 546 [2015]; U.S. Bank N.A. v Dellarmo, 128 A.D.3d 680, 681 [2015]; Eighteen Assoc., LLC v Court St. Pizza, Inc., 66 Misc.3d 148 [A], 2020 NY Slip Op 50261[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2020]).

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as abandoned.

ALIOTTA, P.J., TOUSSAINT and BUGGS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Oparaji v. Miracle Motors, Inc.

Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 2, 2022
2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 51266 (N.Y. App. Term 2022)
Case details for

Oparaji v. Miracle Motors, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Maurice Oparaji, Appellant, v. Miracle Motors, Inc., Maurice G. Mitchell…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 2, 2022

Citations

2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 51266 (N.Y. App. Term 2022)