Opinion
23-1801
06-27-2024
Kingsley Azubuike Ononuju, Appellant Pro Se. Edwin Ford Stephens, CHRISTIAN & BARTON, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: June 25, 2024
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Roderick Charles Young, District Judge. (2:20-cv-00205-RCY-RJK)
Kingsley Azubuike Ononuju, Appellant Pro Se.
Edwin Ford Stephens, CHRISTIAN & BARTON, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before RICHARDSON and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM
Kingsley Azubuike Ononuju appeals the district court's order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying relief. See Aikens v. Ingram, 652 F.3d 496, 501 (4th Cir. 2011) (en banc) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. Ononuju v. Va. Hous. Dev. Auth., No. 2:20-cv-00205-RCY-RJK (E.D. Va. July 19, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED..