OneWest Bank, N.A. v. Ceslik

3 Citing cases

  1. City of Middletown v. Wagner

    AC 46940 (Conn. App. Ct. Sep. 24, 2024)

    Accordingly, we will not review the defendant's claims related to the September 20, 2023 court order. See OneWest Bank, N.A. v. Ceslik, 202 Conn.App. 445, 465-66, 246 A.3d 18 (declining to review claim because defendant did not appeal from or amend appeal to include court's denial of motion related thereto), cert. denied, 336 Conn. 936, 249 A.3d 39 (2021). We have reframed the defendant's remaining claims, in some instances condensing closely related claims, to more accurately reflect the arguments in the defendant's brief.

  2. Sicignano v. Pearce

    228 Conn. App. 664 (Conn. App. Ct. 2024)

    Insofar as the plaintiff’s assertion that the court’s construction and application of the statute in the present case "amount[ed] to a denial of due process" can be construed as a distinct claim independent of his ex post facto claim, his brief is devoid of any legal analysis in support of such a claim, and we therefore decline to review it. See, e.g., OneWest Bank, N.A. v. Ceslik, 202 Conn. App. 445, 467, 246 A.3d 18 (defendant’s due process claim was unreviewable due to inadequate brief in which defendant made only conclusory statements), cert. denied, 336 Conn. 936, 249 A.3d 39 (2021). Furthermore, there is simply no merit to the plaintiff’s alleged due process violation, the gravamen of which is that he did not prevail due to the court’s interpretation of the statute.

  3. Walton v. Walton

    227 Conn. App. 251 (Conn. App. Ct. 2024)

    In the 276absence of a proper challenge to the basis of the court’s ruling, namely, that the appraisal was protected from disclosure by Practice Book § 13-4 (f), the defendant cannot prevail on her claim that the court abused its discretion in so ruling. See OneWest Bank, N.A. v. Ceslik, 202 Conn. App. 445, 456–57, 246 A.3d 18 ("[t]he defendant’s claim is not persuasive because, even if it has merit, it does not undermine the ground on which the court based its decision"), cert, denied, 336 Conn. 936, 249 A.3d 39 (2021).Practice Book § 25-31 provides in relevant part that "the provisions of Sections 13-1 through 13-10 … shall apply to family matters as defined in Section 25-1."