From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Onemata Corp. v. Rahman

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 17, 2023
2:23-cv-00785-JAD-VCF (D. Nev. Aug. 17, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-00785-JAD-VCF

08-17-2023

Onemata Corporation, Plaintiff(s), v. Ashfaq Rahman, et al., Defendant(s).


ORDER

CAM FERENBACH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Before the court is Defendants MaskGene, LLC, Peacenheaven, LLC, Lakemont Property, LLC, BashaBari, LLC, Sunshine Irrevocable Trust, Paradise Valley Irrevocable Trust, and Bright Stars Irrevocable Trust's motion for extension of time. (ECF No. 36). Defendants request an extension to file a response to the complaint to August 17, 2023. Plaintiff does not oppose the request. (ECF No. 39). Defendants filed their answer on August 16, 2023. (ECF NO. 43).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for extension of time (ECF No. 36), is GRANTED.


Summaries of

Onemata Corp. v. Rahman

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 17, 2023
2:23-cv-00785-JAD-VCF (D. Nev. Aug. 17, 2023)
Case details for

Onemata Corp. v. Rahman

Case Details

Full title:Onemata Corporation, Plaintiff(s), v. Ashfaq Rahman, et al., Defendant(s).

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Aug 17, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-00785-JAD-VCF (D. Nev. Aug. 17, 2023)