From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O'Neill v. Linares

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 4, 1998
705 So. 2d 699 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

Case No. 97-3363

Opinion filed February 4, 1998. JANUARY TERM, A.D. 1998

A non-final appeal from the Circuit Court of Dade County, Juan Ramirez, Jr., Judge. L.T. Case No. 96-7113

William S. Pollak, for appellants.

Levine Partners and Alan S. Reiss, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and JORGENSON and FLETCHER, JJ.


The trial court order dissolving the notice of lis pendens filed by the appellants against certain real property is reversed upon a holding that the appellants' equitable lien claim supports the subject lis pendens. See Lakeview Townhomes at the California Club, Inc. v. Lakeview of the California Club Homeowners Ass'n, 579 So.2d 290 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). The case is remanded with directions that the trial court conduct an evidentiary hearing to determine whether appellants should be required to post a bond to protect appellee from any irreparable harm which might result from the maintenance of the lis pendens until conclusion of the litigation between the parties.See Licea v. Anllo, 691 So.2d 29 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Lakeview Townhomes.

Reversed and remanded for further consistent proceedings.


Summaries of

O'Neill v. Linares

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 4, 1998
705 So. 2d 699 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

O'Neill v. Linares

Case Details

Full title:JORGE O'NEILL and RAQUEL O'NEILL, Appellants, vs. TERESA LINARES, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Feb 4, 1998

Citations

705 So. 2d 699 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Citing Cases

Joge Investment, Inc. v. Millennium Capital

We note that if the Respondents properly refile the notice, an evidentiary hearing on the issue of bond must…