From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O'Neill v. Giallombardo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 24, 1975
49 A.D.2d 1002 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Opinion

October 24, 1975

Appeal from the Erie Special Term.

Present — Moule, J.P., Cardamone, Simons and Del Vecchio, JJ.


Order unanimously modified in accordance with memorandum and as modified affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: In view of the denials in the amended answer, by which defendant disputes the existence of a partnership between the parties and the assets acquired by the partnership, plaintiff must establish his preliminary right to an accounting and the scope of the accounting before he is entitled to discovery of the fiscal records which in effect relate solely to the items of the account itself. Such fiscal records — as to which discovery now would be premature (Alderman v Eagle, 41 A.D.2d 641) — include not only bankbooks, bank statements and checks but also ledgers and journals. The protective order should therefore be expanded to include those items within the material not subject to discovery at this time.


Summaries of

O'Neill v. Giallombardo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 24, 1975
49 A.D.2d 1002 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)
Case details for

O'Neill v. Giallombardo

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS H. O'NEILL, JR., Respondent, v. SALVATORE F. GIALLOMBARDO, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 24, 1975

Citations

49 A.D.2d 1002 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Citing Cases

Schreier v. Mascola

As so modified, order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements to defendant. In the absence of an…