From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O'Neill v. General Casualty and Surety Company

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 16, 1927
137 A. 417 (N.J. 1927)

Opinion

Submitted February 11, 1927 —

Decided May 16, 1927.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 4 N.J. Mis. R. 926.

For the respondent, Paul M. Salsburg.

For the appellant, William Charlton.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, PARKER, BLACK, KATZENBACH, LLOYD, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

O'Neill v. General Casualty and Surety Company

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 16, 1927
137 A. 417 (N.J. 1927)
Case details for

O'Neill v. General Casualty and Surety Company

Case Details

Full title:LAURA O'NEILL, RESPONDENT, v. GENERAL CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: May 16, 1927

Citations

137 A. 417 (N.J. 1927)
103 N.J.L. 704

Citing Cases

In re Estate of Owen

"But a distinction was drawn between acts of the lessee directly operating on his estate and the act then sub…

Dodier Rlty. Inv. v. St. Louis Nat. B.B

(3) "Will not" means "not voluntarily". Sinclair v. Sinclair, 224 Ill. App. 130; Medinah Temple Co. v.…