From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O'Neil v. O'Neil

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Aug 31, 1973
210 N.W.2d 237 (Minn. 1973)

Opinion

No. 44024.

August 31, 1973.

Divorce — review — order granting motion for relief following decree — issues rendered moot — attorneys' fees.

Appeal by defendant husband from an order of the Wabasha County District Court, Glenn E. Kelley, Judge, granting plaintiff wife certain relief after entry of a divorce decree. Affirmed.

Albert Thomas O'Neil, pro se, for appellant.

Dolores Margaret O'Neil, pro se, for respondent.

Considered en banc without oral argument.


Plaintiff and defendant were divorced on May 18, 1967, by a decree filed in the Wabasha County District Court. Defendant has appealed from an order of that court granting in part plaintiff's subsequent motion for certain relief. Because of plaintiff's death during the pendency of the appeal, some of the provisions in the order are of no effect and need not be considered.

Defendant's appeal from the part of the court order denying plaintiff's motion to hold defendant in contempt must be denied. As to him, this question is moot.

Defendant also appealed from the part of the court order awarding plaintiff $150 attorneys' fees. The award of attorneys' fees is discretionary and is not predicated on the recipient being the prevailing party. See, Visneski v. Visneski, 219 Minn. 217, 17 N.W.2d 313 (1945). On appeal, the award will not be disturbed absent a clear abuse of discretion. Borchert v. Borchert, 279 Minn. 16, 154 N.W.2d 902 (1967). A careful review of the record discloses no such abuse.

No attorneys' fees or costs are allowed to either of the parties for this appeal.

Affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE KELLY took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


Summaries of

O'Neil v. O'Neil

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Aug 31, 1973
210 N.W.2d 237 (Minn. 1973)
Case details for

O'Neil v. O'Neil

Case Details

Full title:DOLORES MARGARET O'NEIL v. ALBERT THOMAS O'NEIL

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Aug 31, 1973

Citations

210 N.W.2d 237 (Minn. 1973)
210 N.W.2d 237

Citing Cases

Rundell v. Rundell

Since there is no evidence of the actual fees, we cannot conclude the district court abused its discretion by…

Randall v. Steward

On appeal, the award will not be disturbed absent a clear abuse of discretion.O'Neil v. O'Neil, 297 Minn.…