From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O'Neil v. Brooklyn Savings Bank

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jun 10, 1943
180 Misc. 542 (N.Y. App. Term 1943)

Opinion

June 10, 1943.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, KELEHER, J.

Max R. Simon for appellant.

Sedgwick Snedeker for respondent.


MEMORANDUM


The proofs show that plaintiff was employed in the production of goods for commerce within the meaning of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (U.S. Code, tit. 29, § 201 et seq.), and entitled to recover liquidated damages in the sum of $423.16 by reason of defendant's default in making overtime payments as directed therein. The sum of $200 is fixed as a reasonable attorney's fee.

Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and judgment directed in favor of plaintiff for $623.16 with interest on $423.16 from August 30, 1940, and costs.

SHIENTAG, McLAUGHLIN and HECHT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

O'Neil v. Brooklyn Savings Bank

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jun 10, 1943
180 Misc. 542 (N.Y. App. Term 1943)
Case details for

O'Neil v. Brooklyn Savings Bank

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM J. O'NEIL, Appellant, v. BROOKLYN SAVINGS BANK, Defendant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Jun 10, 1943

Citations

180 Misc. 542 (N.Y. App. Term 1943)
43 N.Y.S.2d 25

Citing Cases

Brooklyn Bank v. O'Neil

unless such employee receives compensation for his employment in excess of the hours above specified at a…

Withers v. Purdy Management Corp.

But on its face the defense is sufficient (see Rigopoulos v. Kervan, 47 F. Supp. 576, affd. on this point 140…