Opinion
70-CV-35
April 7, 2003
CRAVATH SWAINE LAW FIRM, THOMAS D. BARR, ESQ., New York, NY, Attorneys for Oneida Indian Nation of New York.
ZUCKERMAN SPAEDER LAW FIRM, WILLIAM W. TAYLOR, ESQ., Washington, D.C., Attorneys for Oneida Indian Nation of New York.
ARLINDA LOCKLEAR, ESQ., Jefferson, M.D., Attorney for Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wisconsin.
PAUL WEISS LAW FIRM, CAREY R. RAMOS, ESQ., New York, NY, Attorneys for Oneida of the Thames Council.
NIXON PEABODY LAW FIRM, G. ROBERT WITMER, JR., ESQ., Rochester, NY, ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS, COUNTY OF ONEIDA, NEW YORK, COUNTY OF MADISON, NEW YORK.
HON. ELLIOT SPITZER, DAVID B. ROBERTS, Asst. Attorney General, Albany, NY, Attorney General of the State of New York.
BOND SHOENECK KING, JOHN J. DEE, ESQ. Syracuse, NY.
ORDER
In accordance with the mandate and "Stipulation to Remand Case for Entry of Judgment on Cross-Motions under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)" filed in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals on March 27, 2003, and filed in the Northern District of New York on April 7, 2002, and in accordance with this court's MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER in Oneida Indian Nation of New York v. The County of Oneida, No. 70-CV-35, 2003 WL 1564241 (N.D.N.Y. March 24, 2003),
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the defendants' motion pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(1), for relief from the August 29, 2002 judgment previously entered in this action, is GRANTED; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that plaintiffs' cross-motion pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6) for relief from the August 29, 2002 judgment previously entered in this action, is GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.