From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O'Neal v. Sirmons

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Jan 9, 2008
No. CIV-07-1090-C (W.D. Okla. Jan. 9, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV-07-1090-C.

January 9, 2008


ORDER


This action for habeas corpus relief brought by a prisoner, proceeding pro se, was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Robert E. Bacharach, consistent with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Judge Bacharach entered a Report and Recommendation on November 30, 2007, to which Petitioner has timely objected. The Court therefore considers the matter de novo.

The facts and relevant law are set out in full in the accurate and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and there is no purpose to be served in repeating them yet again. In his objection, Petitioner merely restates the conclusions and legal argument originally asserted, and raises no issue not fully and accurately addressed and rejected by the Magistrate Judge.

Accordingly, the Court adopts, in its entirety, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and for the reasons announced therein, this petition for habeas corpus relief is denied. A Judgment will enter accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

O'Neal v. Sirmons

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Jan 9, 2008
No. CIV-07-1090-C (W.D. Okla. Jan. 9, 2008)
Case details for

O'Neal v. Sirmons

Case Details

Full title:TRAVIS L. O'NEAL, Petitioner v. MARTY SIRMONS, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Date published: Jan 9, 2008

Citations

No. CIV-07-1090-C (W.D. Okla. Jan. 9, 2008)