From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

One Big-Six Studebaker Automobile v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 28, 1923
289 F. 256 (9th Cir. 1923)

Opinion


289 F. 256 (9th Cir. 1923) ONE BIG-SIX STUDEBAKER AUTOMOBILE, etc., et al. v. UNITED STATES. No. 3934. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. May 28, 1923

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Montana; George M. Bourquin, Judge.

Proceeding by the United States to forfeit one Big-Six Studebaker automobile, tools, and accessories; Harvey Noble, claimant. Decree of forfeiture, and claimant brings error. Reversed.

Internal revenue 2-- Forfeiture of vehicles statute repealed by National Prohibition Act.

Bev. St. Sec. 3450 (Comp. St. Sec. 6352), as to forfeitures of vehicles, was repealed by National Prohibition Act.

Freeman, Thelen & Frary, of Great Falls, Mont., for plaintiffs in error.

John L. Slattery, U.S. Atty., and Ronald Higgins and W. H. Meigs, Asst. U.S. Attys., all of Helena, Mont.

Before GILBERT and RUDKIN, Circuit Judges, and WOLVERTON, District judge.

PER CURIAM.

This is a proceeding under section 3450 of the Revised Statutes (Comp. St. Sec. 6352) to forfeit an automobile used in the transportation of intoxicating liquor. In McDowell v. United States, 286 F. 521, decided February 5, 1923, this court held that section 3450 was repealed by the National Prohibition Act (41 Stat. 305).

For the reasons there stated, the decree is reversed.


Summaries of

One Big-Six Studebaker Automobile v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 28, 1923
289 F. 256 (9th Cir. 1923)
Case details for

One Big-Six Studebaker Automobile v. United States

Case Details

Full title:ONE BIG-SIX STUDEBAKER AUTOMOBILE, etc., et al. v. UNITED STATES.

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: May 28, 1923

Citations

289 F. 256 (9th Cir. 1923)

Citing Cases

Ventresca v. United States

Such a duty cannot be delegated to the accuser. United States v. Harnich, 289 F. 256 (D.Conn. 1922). Limited…

Siden v. United States

When the facts on which the magistrate's conclusion of probable cause is based are not stated in the…