Omtvedt v. Jansen

2 Citing cases

  1. In re Marriage of Graves

    No. A23-1620 (Minn. Ct. App. Aug. 12, 2024)

    See Kimmel v. Kimmel, 392 N.W.2d 904, 909 (Minn.App. 1986) (affirming finding that parent's behavior endangered child based in part on "[s]chool records show[ing] that [the child] has progressed significantly since placement with his father"), rev. denied (Minn. Oct. 29, 1986).See also Omtvedt v. Jansen, No. A14-0418, 2015 WL 134015, at *5 (Minn.App. Jan. 12, 2015) (parent's interference with child's educational stability endangered minor's "emotional and psychological development"). Omtvedt is a nonprecedential opinion and we cite it only for its persuasive value.

  2. Javed v. Siwani

    No. A23-1356 (Minn. Ct. App. Jun. 3, 2024)

    Since Hagen, this court repeatedly has concluded that an appellant forfeited an argument based on the presumed 25-percent minimum by not making the argument to the district court. See, e.g., Stilwagon v. Stilwagon, No. A21-0739, 2022 WL 92964, at *4 (Minn.App. Jan. 10, 2022); Ryan v. Ryan, No. A18-1526, 2019 WL 4254831, at *3 (Minn.App. Sept. 9, 2019); In re Custody of N.O.K., No. A16-0570, 2016 WL 6570302, at *8 (Minn.App. Nov. 7, 2016), rev. denied (Minn. Jan. 25, 2017); Phelps v. Sterling, No. A14-1107, 2015 WL 5088926, at *7 (Minn.App. Aug. 31, 2015); Covington v. Eckstrom, No. A14-1262, 2015 WL 3822862, at *7 (Minn.App. June 22, 2015); Omtvedt v. Jansen, No. A14-0418, 2015 WL 134015, at *6 (Minn.App. Jan. 12, 2015); see also Minn. R. Civ. App. P. 136.01, subd. 1(c) (providing that nonprecedential opinions are "not binding authority" but "may be cited as persuasive authority").