Opinion
2018-1494 K C
12-06-2019
OMPHIL CARE, INC., as Assignee of Rivera, Eugenio, Respondent, v. GEICO INS. CO., Appellant.
Rivkin Radler, LLP (Stuart M. Bodoff of counsel), for appellant. The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell of counsel), for respondent.
Rivkin Radler, LLP (Stuart M. Bodoff of counsel), for appellant.
The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell of counsel), for respondent.
PRESENT: MICHAEL L. PESCE, P.J., THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, BERNICE D. SIEGAL, JJ
ORDERED that the order, insofar as appealed from, is reversed, with $30 costs, and defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.
In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff moved for summary judgment, and defendant cross-moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff had failed to appear for duly scheduled examinations under oath (EUOs). As limited by the brief, defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Civil Court entered June 18, 2018 as denied defendant's cross motion for summary judgment.
In support of its cross motion, defendant submitted an affirmation from the attorney who was to perform the EUOs, which affirmation was sufficient to establish that plaintiff had failed to appear for the scheduled EUOs (see Stephen Fogel Psychological, P.C. v. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co. , 35 AD3d 720 [2006] ). Moreover, a review of the record establishes that the Civil Court correctly determined that defendant had established the timely and proper mailing of the EUO scheduling letters and the denial of claim forms (see St. Vincent's Hosp. of Richmond v. Government Empls. Ins. Co. , 50 AD3d 1123 [2008] ).
Accordingly, the order, insofar as appealed from, is reversed and defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.
PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SIEGAL, JJ., concur.