Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

Omark Industries, Inc. v. Alewine

164 Ga. App. 397 (Ga. Ct. App. 1982)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
Omark Industries, Inc. v. Alewine

3 Citing cases

  1. Brown v. Urvant

    No. A23A0567 (Ga. Ct. App. Nov. 3, 2023)

    (Emphasis supplied.) Omark Indus. v. Alewine, 164 Ga.App. 397, 397 (298 S.E.2d 259) (1982). As has been instructed, "[a] deceased person cannot be a party to legal proceedings....

  2. McCarley v. McCarley

    246 Ga. App. 171 (Ga. Ct. App. 2000)   Cited 8 times

    See Stephenson, supra.Omark Industries v. Alewine, 164 Ga. App. 397 ( 298 S.E.2d 259) (1982).Judgment reversed in both cases.

  3. Omark Indus. Inc. v. Alewine

    171 Ga. App. 207 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984)   Cited 15 times
    Holding manufacturer of hydraulic loading mechanism was not liable because injuries sustained by operator when hydraulic hose burst resulted from negligent installation or maintenance occurring after product left the manufacturer

    In a previous interlocutory appeal from the denial of the same motion, we vacated the court's order due to indications in the record that Mr. Alewine was no longer living. See Omark Indus. v. Alewine, 164 Ga. App. 397 ( 298 S.E.2d 259) (1982). On remand, the trial court allowed Susan Alewine to be substituted as the party plaintiff in her capacity as administratrix of Mr. Alewine's estate, and the court then denied a renewed motion by the appellants for summary judgment.