From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

OMAR v. ZIPCO, INC.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Jan 29, 2004
No. 02-04-001-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 29, 2004)

Opinion

No. 02-04-001-CV.

Delivered: January 29, 2004.

Appeal from the 342nd District Court of Tarrant County.

Attorney(s) for Appellant: Burns, Cole, P.C., and Patricia Cole of Fort Worth, TX.

Attorney(s) for Appellee: Downs Stanford, P.C., and Monroe Gaddy Wells of Dallas, TX.

PANEL D: LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT


We have considered appellant's "Motion To Dismiss Appeal." It is the court's opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let execution issue.


Summaries of

OMAR v. ZIPCO, INC.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Jan 29, 2004
No. 02-04-001-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 29, 2004)
Case details for

OMAR v. ZIPCO, INC.

Case Details

Full title:KHALED OMAR, Appellant v. ZIPCO, INC. Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: Jan 29, 2004

Citations

No. 02-04-001-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 29, 2004)