From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Olvera v. Adams

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 6, 2009
No. CIV S-09-0869 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 6, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-0869 DAD P.

April 6, 2009


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis. In his application, petitioner challenges a judgment of conviction entered in the Stanislaus County Superior Court. Stanislaus County is part of the Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 3-120(d).

Pursuant to Local Rule 3-120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper division of a court may, on the court's own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court. This court will not rule on petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This court has not ruled on petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis;

2. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Fresno; and

3. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be filed at:

United States District Court
Eastern District of California
2500 Tulare Street
Fresno, CA 93721


Summaries of

Olvera v. Adams

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 6, 2009
No. CIV S-09-0869 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 6, 2009)
Case details for

Olvera v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:CAIN MORA OLVERA, Petitioner, v. DERAL G. ADAMS, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 6, 2009

Citations

No. CIV S-09-0869 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 6, 2009)