From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Olstza v. Fenton

Appellate Court of Connecticut
Jun 16, 1989
560 A.2d 992 (Conn. App. Ct. 1989)

Opinion

(7091)

Argued May 4, 1989

Decision released June 16, 1989

Action to recover damages for medical malpractice, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of New Haven and tried to the jury before Flanagan, J.; verdict and judgment for the defendant, from which the plaintiffs appealed to this court. No error.

Richard A. Fuchs, for the appellants (plaintiffs).

Agnes M. Cahill, with whom, on the brief, was Michael P. Del Sole, for the appellee (defendant).


The plaintiffs have appealed from the judgment rendered in favor of the defendant in this medical malpractice action. The sole issue raised is whether the trial court correctly charged the jury on the foreseeability of harm. The charge given by the trial court in this case comports with the charge on foreseeability of harm approved by our Supreme Court in Pisel v. Stamford Hospital, 180 Conn. 314, 331-32, 430 A.2d 1 (1980).


Summaries of

Olstza v. Fenton

Appellate Court of Connecticut
Jun 16, 1989
560 A.2d 992 (Conn. App. Ct. 1989)
Case details for

Olstza v. Fenton

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND OLSTZA ET AL. v. ROBERT H. FENTON ET AL

Court:Appellate Court of Connecticut

Date published: Jun 16, 1989

Citations

560 A.2d 992 (Conn. App. Ct. 1989)
19 Conn. App. 802