From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Olson v. Puckett

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 10, 2022
2:21-CV-1482-KJM-DMC (E.D. Cal. Jun. 10, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-CV-1482-KJM-DMC

06-10-2022

KIMBERLY OLSON, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT PUCKETT, SR., et al., Defendants.


ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for administrative relief pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 233. See ECF No. 98. Defendants have not filed any opposition within the time allowed therefor under Local Rule 233(b) and the matter is now submitted for immediate decision without a hearing pursuant to Local Rule 233(c).

In her motion for administrative relief, Plaintiff seeks an extension of time to file a reply in support of her motion for summary adjudication. Good cause appearing therefor and given Defendants' lack of any opposition, Plaintiff's motion for administrative relief is granted. Plaintiff may file and serve her reply brief within 30 days of the date of this order. Thereafter, Plaintiff's motion for summary adjudication will stand submitted without oral argument pursuant to the Court's March 3, 2022, order. See ECF No. 71.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Olson v. Puckett

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 10, 2022
2:21-CV-1482-KJM-DMC (E.D. Cal. Jun. 10, 2022)
Case details for

Olson v. Puckett

Case Details

Full title:KIMBERLY OLSON, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT PUCKETT, SR., et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 10, 2022

Citations

2:21-CV-1482-KJM-DMC (E.D. Cal. Jun. 10, 2022)