From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Olson v. Gammon

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 18, 2006
180 F. App'x 724 (9th Cir. 2006)

Opinion

Submitted May 15, 2006.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Dana L. Olson, Wasilla, AK, pro se.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska, John W. Sedwick, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-04-00042-A-JWS.

Before: B. FLETCHER, TROTT, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Dana L. Olson appeals pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) her action alleging violations of her civil rights. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

The district court entered separate judgment dismissing Olson's action on July 12, 2004. The district court denied Olson's final post-judgment motion for reconsideration on July 23, 2004. Because Olson failed to file her notice of appeal until September 13, 2004, this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(4)(A) (notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of the entry of an order disposing of the last post-judgment tolling

Page 725.

motion); Malone v. Avenenti, 850 F.2d 569, 572 (9th Cir.1988) (noting that a timely-filed notice of appeal is both mandatory and jurisdictional).

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Olson v. Gammon

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 18, 2006
180 F. App'x 724 (9th Cir. 2006)
Case details for

Olson v. Gammon

Case Details

Full title:Dana L. OLSON, Plaintiff--Appellant, v. Shirley GAMMON; et al.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: May 18, 2006

Citations

180 F. App'x 724 (9th Cir. 2006)

Citing Cases

Jacobson v. State

It is not enough to show too many have been united. Olson v. Shirley, 12 N.D. 106, 96 N.W. 297. No…