Opinion
22-cv-00098-JFM
07-11-2022
CIRO MENDOZA OLMERO, on behalf of himself, Plaintiff, v. PIO PIO NYC, INC., PIO PIO NYC, INC. d/b/a PIO PIO, SIPAN RESTAURANT OF NEW YORK, INC. d/b/a PIO PIO, PIO PIO OCHO, INC. d/b/a PIO PIO, PIO PIO 34, INC. d/b/a PIO PIO, PIO PIO 85, INC. d/b/a PIO PIO, PIO PIO EXPRESS, INC. d/b/a PIO PIO EXPRESS, POLLOS A LA BRASA PIO, PIO, INC. d/b/a PIO PIO, PIO-PIO RESTAURANT, INC. d/b/a PIO PIO, EL PILLO INC. d/b/a AMARU, MOCHICA GROUP CORP., INES YALLICO and AUGUSTO YALLICO Defendants.
[PROPOSED] RULE 68 JUDGMENT
WHEREAS, pursuant to Rule 68 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendants PIO PIO NYC, INC. d/b/a PIO PIO, SIPAN RESTAURANT OF NEW YORK, INC. d/b/a PIO PIO, PIO PIO OCHO, INC. d/b/a PIO PIO, PIO PIO 34, INC. d/b/a PIO PIO, PIO PIO 85, INC. d/b/a PIO PIO, PIO PIO EXPRESS, INC. d/b/a PIO PIO EXPRESS, POLLOS A LA BRASA PIO, PIO, INC. d/b/a PIO PIO, PIO-PIO RESTAURANT, INC. d/b/a PIO PIO, EL PILLO INC. d/b/a AMARU, MOCHICA GROUP CORP., INES YALLICO and AUGUSTO YALLICO (collectively, “Defendants”) having offered to allow Plaintiff CIRO MENDOZA OLMERO (“Plaintiff”) to take a judgment against them, in the sum of Seventy-Five Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($75,000.00), in accordance with the terms and conditions of Defendants' Rule 68 Offer dated July 8, 2022 and filed as Exhibit A to Docket Number 51;
WHEREAS, on July 8, 2022, Plaintiff's attorney having confirmed Plaintiff's acceptance of Defendants' Offer of Judgment (Dkt. No. 51);
It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, that judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff CIRO MENDOZA OLMERO, in the sum of Seventy-Five Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($75,000.00), in accordance with the terms and conditions of Defendants' Rule 68 Offer dated July 8, 2022 and filed as Exhibit A to Docket Number 51.
SO ORDERED.