From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Olivero v. Foulk

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 27, 2015
Case No. CV 14-2275-CAS (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 27, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. CV 14-2275-CAS (JEM)

01-27-2015

ANGEL M. OLIVERO, Petitioner, v. F. FOULK, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No Objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed within the time allowed for Objections. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice. DATED: January 27, 2015

/s/_________

CHRISTINA A. SNYDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Olivero v. Foulk

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 27, 2015
Case No. CV 14-2275-CAS (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 27, 2015)
Case details for

Olivero v. Foulk

Case Details

Full title:ANGEL M. OLIVERO, Petitioner, v. F. FOULK, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 27, 2015

Citations

Case No. CV 14-2275-CAS (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 27, 2015)

Citing Cases

Poletti v. Hatton

"A prosecutor's . . . intemperate behavior violates the federal Constitution only when it comprises a pattern…