From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oliver v. Winco Holdings, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 8, 2010
NO. CIV. S-06-656 LKK/KJM (E.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2010)

Opinion

NO. CIV. S-06-656 LKK/KJM.

February 8, 2010


ORDER


This case was previously stayed and administratively closed pending binding arbitration. Plaintiff contends that her prior counsel agreed to this without her knowledge or permission. See Dkt. No. 10.

On October 15, 2009, the court lifted the stay, reopened the case, and granted plaintiff sixty days to retain alternate counsel. The court stated that after sixty days, defendant would be free to bring any motions it deemed necessary seeking dismissal of this action. That time has expired, and neither party has filed any further documents in this case.

It appears that plaintiff has abandoned this case. Where a plaintiff fails to prosecute a case, the court may dismiss the case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Plaintiff is therefore ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing within thirty days why this case should not be dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Oliver v. Winco Holdings, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 8, 2010
NO. CIV. S-06-656 LKK/KJM (E.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2010)
Case details for

Oliver v. Winco Holdings, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PRINCESS OLIVER, Plaintiff, v. WINCO HOLDINGS, INC., dba WINCO FOODS; DAVE…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 8, 2010

Citations

NO. CIV. S-06-656 LKK/KJM (E.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2010)