From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oliver v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
Feb 27, 2001
38 S.W.3d 473 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. ED 77951.

February 27, 2001

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS HONORABLE BOOKER T. SHAW.

Raymund J. Capelovitch, Asst. Public Defender, 1221 Locust Street, Suite 350, St. Louis, MO 63103, Attorneys For Appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Evan J. Buchheim, Asst. Attorney General, P. O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899, Attorneys For Respondent.

Before: Lawrence E. Mooney, P.J. and Paul J. Simon and Sherri B. Sullivan, JJ.


ORDER


Willie Oliver (Movant) appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without a hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Oliver v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
Feb 27, 2001
38 S.W.3d 473 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Oliver v. State

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE OLIVER, Appellant, vs. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four

Date published: Feb 27, 2001

Citations

38 S.W.3d 473 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)