From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oliver v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Jan 23, 1912
120 P. 1129 (Okla. Crim. App. 1912)

Opinion

No. A-1228.

Opinion Filed January 23, 1912.

Appeal from Seminole County Court; T.S. Cobb, Judge.

Thad Oliver was convicted of violating the prohibitory law, and appeals. Affirmed.

Davis Davis, for plaintiff in error.

Smith C. Matson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.


Plaintiff in error was convicted at the January, 1911, term of the county court of Seminole county on a charge of selling intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at a fine of one hundred dollars and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of thirty days, in accordance with the verdict of the jury. No briefs have been filed on behalf of plaintiff in error, and no appearance made for oral argument. The Attorney General has filed a motion to affirm for want of prosecution under rule 4 of this court. The motion is sustained. Let the judgment be affirmed.


Summaries of

Oliver v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Jan 23, 1912
120 P. 1129 (Okla. Crim. App. 1912)
Case details for

Oliver v. State

Case Details

Full title:THAD OLIVER v. STATE

Court:Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma

Date published: Jan 23, 1912

Citations

120 P. 1129 (Okla. Crim. App. 1912)
6 Okla. Crim. 730