From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oliver v. Santiago

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Aug 23, 2016
Civil Action No. 14-1334 (MCA) (D.N.J. Aug. 23, 2016)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 14-1334 (MCA)

08-23-2016

LORENZO OLIVER, Petitioner, v. ANGEL L. SANTIAGO, et al., Respondents.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter having been opened by pro se Petitioner Lorenzo Oliver's motion for an extension of time in which to file his reply to the State's answer. His motion for an extension of time was docketed on January 8, 2016. (ECF No. 15.) Shortly after that motion was filed, however, Petitioner submitted what appears to be his reply brief and accompanying appendix, which were docketed on January 29, 2016. (ECF No. 16.) It is not clear, therefore, whether Petitioner's submission constitutes his complete reply or whether he is still seeking an extension of time within which to file his reply.

THEREFORE, it is on this day of 23 of August, 2016;

ORDERED that, Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time within which to file his reply is GRANTED; to the extent Petitioner's January 29, 2016 submission constitutes his complete reply, no further action is required; to the extent Petitioner still seeks additional time within which to file his reply, he may submit an all-inclusive reply within 45 days of his receipt of this Order; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Memorandum and Order upon Petitioner by regular U.S. mail.

/s/_________

Madeline Cox Arleo, District Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Oliver v. Santiago

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Aug 23, 2016
Civil Action No. 14-1334 (MCA) (D.N.J. Aug. 23, 2016)
Case details for

Oliver v. Santiago

Case Details

Full title:LORENZO OLIVER, Petitioner, v. ANGEL L. SANTIAGO, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Aug 23, 2016

Citations

Civil Action No. 14-1334 (MCA) (D.N.J. Aug. 23, 2016)