From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oliver v. Rozum

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 26, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-318 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 26, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-318

02-26-2013

JAMES OLIVER v. GERALD ROZUM, ET AL.


ORDER

AND NOW, this 25th day of February, 2013, upon careful and independent consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Docket No. 1), and after review of United States Magistrate Judge Lynne A Sitarski's Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 17), to which Petitioner has filed no Objections, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Sitarski is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
2. The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DISMISSED.
3. Because Petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right or to demonstrate that a reasonable jurist would debate the correctness of this ruling, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).
4. The Clerk shall CLOSE this case statistically.

BY THE COURT:

____________________

John R. Padova, J.


Summaries of

Oliver v. Rozum

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 26, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-318 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 26, 2013)
Case details for

Oliver v. Rozum

Case Details

Full title:JAMES OLIVER v. GERALD ROZUM, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Feb 26, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-318 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 26, 2013)