From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

OLIVER v. NOLL

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Oct 20, 2011
C 09-3840 RMW (PR) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2011)

Opinion

C 09-3840 RMW (PR).

October 20, 2011


[ PROPOSED ] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO CHANGE TIME TO FILE A DISPOSITIVE MOTION


Defendants Gallegos, Medina, and Variz (Defendants) have filed a request for an extension of time of time of fourteen days days, up to and including, September 14, 2011, in which to file a reply to Plaintiff James Lucius Oliver's opposition to Defendants' dispositive motion. This Court has reviewed Defendants' request and the declaration of Brendan M. Kenny, and finds good cause to GRANT the request. Accordingly, Defendants have up to and including September 14, 2011 to file a reply to Oliver's opposition to Defendants' dispositive motion.


Summaries of

OLIVER v. NOLL

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Oct 20, 2011
C 09-3840 RMW (PR) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2011)
Case details for

OLIVER v. NOLL

Case Details

Full title:JAMES LUCIUS OLIVER, Plaintiff, v. C. NOLL, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division

Date published: Oct 20, 2011

Citations

C 09-3840 RMW (PR) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2011)