Opinion
2:22-cv-468-JLB-KCD
04-25-2023
THOMAS OLIVER and NORMA OLIVER, Plaintiffs, v. JOSEPH L. MICHAUD, MATTHEW H. MICHAUD, DOUGLAS H. SMITH, ALYSSA L. PARENT, STEVEN J. HART, SARAH TAFT-CARTER, BRIAN THOMPSON, DANIELLE KEEGAN, BRIAN OATES, CLAUDIA M. ABREAU, JAMES D. SLYVESTER, MICHAEL K. ROINSON, JOEL A. ROBINSON and ROBINSON LAW ASSOCIATES, LLC, Defendants.
ORDER
JOHN L. BADALAMENTI, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.
The Magistrate Judge has entered a Report and Recommendation, recommending that the Court dismiss Plaintiffs' action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. (Doc. 19). No party has objected, and the time to do so has expired.
A district judge may accept, reject, or modify the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The district judge must “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” Id.
Here, after an independent review of the record, and noting that no objection has been filed, the Court finds that the thorough and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation is due to be adopted.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 19) is ADOPTED and made part of this Order for all purposes.
2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute.
3. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment dismissing the case without prejudice, terminate all deadlines, and close the case.
ORDERED.