From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oliver v. Mel

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 24, 2021
2:18-CV-1809-KJM-DMC (E.D. Cal. Aug. 24, 2021)

Opinion

2:18-CV-1809-KJM-DMC

08-24-2021

DARON MICHAEL OLIVER, Plaintiff, v. MEL, Defendant.


ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion, ECF No. 67, for leave to file a fourth amended complaint. Plaintiff seeks leave to amend in order to name defendants who were named in the second amended complaint - Hatley and Shelton - but who were inadvertently not named in the operative third amended complaint. No. opposition to Plaintiff's motion has been filed. Good cause appearing therefor, Plaintiff's motion is granted. Plaintiff may file a fourth amended complaint within 30 days of the date of this order. If Plaintiff does not file his fourth amended complaint within this time period, the action shall proceed on the third amended complaint, ECF No. 59, as against Defendant Mel only.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Oliver v. Mel

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 24, 2021
2:18-CV-1809-KJM-DMC (E.D. Cal. Aug. 24, 2021)
Case details for

Oliver v. Mel

Case Details

Full title:DARON MICHAEL OLIVER, Plaintiff, v. MEL, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 24, 2021

Citations

2:18-CV-1809-KJM-DMC (E.D. Cal. Aug. 24, 2021)