From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oliver v. Koenig

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 28, 2021
Case No. 2:20-cv-00807-TJH-AFM (C.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2021)

Opinion

Case No. 2:20-cv-00807-TJH-AFM

01-28-2021

ANTHONY WAYNE OLIVER, Petitioner, v. C. KOENIG, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, records on file and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. The time for filing Objections to the Report and Recommendation has passed and Objections have not been received. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered (1) granting Respondent's motion to dismiss the petition; (2) denying the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; and (3) dismissing the action with prejudice. DATED: JANUARY 28, 2021

/s/_________

TERRY J. HATTER, JR.

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Oliver v. Koenig

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 28, 2021
Case No. 2:20-cv-00807-TJH-AFM (C.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2021)
Case details for

Oliver v. Koenig

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY WAYNE OLIVER, Petitioner, v. C. KOENIG, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 28, 2021

Citations

Case No. 2:20-cv-00807-TJH-AFM (C.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2021)