From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oliver v. Carey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 29, 2011
No. CIV S-06-0390 MCE EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 29, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-0390 MCE EFB P

09-29-2011

JAMES OLIVER, Plaintiff, v. TOM CAREY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On August 23, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days from the date the findings and recommendations were served. After an extension of time, plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 23, 2011 (ECF 104), are ADOPTED in full;

2. Defendants Noriega's and Mahmoud's January 21, 2011 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED.

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Oliver v. Carey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 29, 2011
No. CIV S-06-0390 MCE EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 29, 2011)
Case details for

Oliver v. Carey

Case Details

Full title:JAMES OLIVER, Plaintiff, v. TOM CAREY, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 29, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-06-0390 MCE EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 29, 2011)