From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oliver v. Carey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 8, 2007
No. 2:06-cv-0390-MCE-EFB-P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2007)

Opinion

No. 2:06-cv-0390-MCE-EFB-P.

March 8, 2007


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On January 17, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. After an extension of time, plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed January 17, 2007, are adopted in full;

2. This action is dismissed for plaintiff's failure to state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A; see also Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1128 (9th Cir. 2000) (indigent prisoner proceeding without counsel must be given leave to file amended complaint unless the court can rule out any possibility that the plaintiff could state a claim).


Summaries of

Oliver v. Carey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 8, 2007
No. 2:06-cv-0390-MCE-EFB-P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2007)
Case details for

Oliver v. Carey

Case Details

Full title:JAMES OLIVER, Plaintiff, v. TOM CAREY, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 8, 2007

Citations

No. 2:06-cv-0390-MCE-EFB-P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2007)